Another Episode of Black Moral Chaos

loot4

What’s been allowed to happen in Baltimore is a moral and cultural abomination. Once again, so-called activists, a large number of them black, have been allowed to attack and assault police officers in addition to destroying public and private property. These so-called demonstrators claim anger over what happened to 25-year-old Freddie Gray who died in police custody, allegedly from three fractured vertebrae and a crushed voice box. Specific details are still forthcoming and if the officers are in fact guilty of negligence, they should be fired, they should lose their pensions, and be prosecuted.  If found guilty, they should be punished.

Just like many incidents prior- notably Sanford, Florida and Ferguson, Missouri- protestors have decided to rob, loot, damage and destroy the city of Baltimore as an expression of justifiable outrage. Rather than comporting themselves with dignity and respect, and waiting for the details to be released in regards to how and why Gray died, these degenerate “protestors” and “demonstrators” are acting like wild animals who have escaped their natural habitat, wreaking havoc and terror on civilized society.

After all, nothing says “justice” like out-of-control blacks attacking random whites and causing chaos as they burn, damage, destroy buildings in addition to looting stores- making off with liquor, televisions and shoes- while inconveniencing thousands of city residents who had absolutely nothing to do with Gray’s death.

Aside from the ‘soft bigotry of low expectations’ that allow and excuses bad black behavior in such socially destructive ways we don’t dare allow from any other racial group, once again this despicable behavior unfairly stigmatizes those blacks who condemn and are embarrassed by such conduct.

Why has the mayor of Baltimore allowed these reprobates to cause this kind of damage to the city? And she did allow it, which is why Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is partially responsible for this citywide mayhem. She directed the Baltimore Police Department to “give those who wished to destroy space to do that as well.” Rawlings-Blake went on to say, “We work very hard to keep that balance [between free speech and destructive elements], and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate.”

Idiot. Moron.

What political leader in their right mind directs peace officers to stand by and watch as hooligans are given the chance to engage in violence and destroy property? You don’t cater to a mob made up of thugs who distrust and dislike law enforcement, and give them an outlet for their behavior-letting them vent- as if once these degenerates have gotten their misplaced anger out of their system, they’ll clean up their mess and quietly go home.

Because of the mayor’s failure to act quickly and appropriately, the Baltimore Police Department is in need of the National Guard to come in to help restore order in Baltimore after the Maryland Governor Larry Hogan declared a state of emergency.

Scenes of burning and chaos in Baltimore are reminiscent of Gotham’s chaos in The Dark Knight Rises and Rawlings-Blake did her part to facilitate it. Her city is being destroyed and it shows- aside from the stupidity of allowing thugs an opportunity to start their demolition of the city she presides over- just how incompetent she is. It also shows just how stupid the policy of allowing blacks- the only group this low standard applies- to act in such disgraceful ways, just and only because they’re black.

For this reason, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake should be forced to step down. She’s obviously demonstrated a clear lack of leadership and competence. But she won’t be forced to leave, because she’s a woman, black and Democrat. But not just a Democrat, but a member of the Democratic National Committee.

Ah, affirmative action.

And for those who’re complaining that the people demolishing Baltimore aren’t residents- who cares? That’s not the point. What matters is the damn behavior that’s being allowed and which lends itself to scorn and condemnation- the riots, the fires, the looting, the attacking police, regardless of what geographic area these pieces of scum hail.

Unfortunately what we’re seeing is the culmination of what began with the Trayvon Martin circus. This is the environment that Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Al Sharpton, the grievance industries, and the mainstream media helped create and nurture. Racial divisiveness, mixed with healthy and consistent doses of ‘blame whitey’ and ‘white privilege’- in addition to too many people excusing bad black behavior and justifying it under the guise of acceptable “anger” has created this environment.

More to the point, this behavior is precisely what happens when people completely embrace the idea that they’re forever victims of social, economic or racial injustice. Blacks are convinced- against any and all evidence to the contrary- that the “system” is “racist” and intentionally set up against them. Forget the idea of personal responsibility for one’s actions. When you’re a victim, you have grievances; when you have grievances, it’s always someone, anyone or everyone else’s fault. People who’re convinced that their identity is that of victim feel justifiably entitled to act in the way we saw in Sanford and Ferguson, that we’re seeing in Baltimore and which I’m sure we’ll see again very soon.

And where does this kind of damaging mindset of victimization and perpetual grievance come from? Leftism. Leftism in all its forms has done a tremendous disservice to blacks, having poisoned their minds and hearts, leaving them perpetually angry and racially paranoid. Though I still lay the blame on Obama, Holder and company- all Leftists, by the way- all of this anti-social behavior is the culmination of what the Left has done to blacks since the 1960’s. White progressives have made perpetual children of blacks, whose temper tantrums- which continues to be the only way blacks are able to articulate their frustrations- must be endured as proof of a still racist county absolving itself of its past racial sins and other injustices.

And the resentment this creates and nourishes among mainstream America might be too large to overcome.

That black people continue to humiliate themselves like this is disgusting and I’m sick of it. White people are too frightened to tell the truth about bad black behavior for fear of verbal and physical reprisals. Blacks are too afraid to speak out against criminal behavior that lends itself to black stereotypes because of racial empathy and racial solidarity.

But, those blacks that choose not to condemn these lawless actions- largely a product of the black underclass, but increasingly adopted and justified by blacks in the middle class- that sit silently on the sidelines out of fear and/or racial solidarity and empathy are, in my opinion, traitors to their race and their country. Their silence condones this behavior. Their lack of justifiable outrage for unjustifiable black lawlessness in cities across America sends a clear message that the jungle behavior that destroys our nation’s cities is an appropriate way to air one’s grievances, real or imagined. Black silence in the face of vandalism and continuing anarchic riots betrays everything their cultural ancestors achieved. Silent blacks are guilty of undermining the achievements of abolitionists and freed slaves, of undermining blacks who fought against insurmountable odds to prove to former slave owners and other whites who were suspect of black humanity that blacks were every bit as dignified as they were; of damaging the legacy of blacks who successfully fought their way into the American mainstream though legalized discrimination fought back. America isn’t perfect, but black silence is complicit in unnecessarily betraying a country that has given blacks every material benefit and social opportunity their forebears could only dream of.

Blacks will never- never– get ahead, or be taken seriously, as long as we endorse this kind of behavior- our silent complicity telling beleaguered onlookers that this kind of conduct is acceptable and must be endured.

This behavior shouldn’t be endured. The behavior we saw in Sanford, Florida was inexcusable.

The behavior we saw in Ferguson, Missouri was inexcusable.

The behavior we saw in New York City, where marchers chanted anti-police slogans including “What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now,” was inexcusable.

The behavior of the so-called ‘black lives matter campaign’ characterized by stopping traffic on city streets and freeways, screaming at restaurant patrons or taking over department stores in multiple cities while annoying and inconveniencing people… this kind of petulance aside from not endearing people to their message, was and is, inexcusable.

And of course, the behavior in Baltimore is inexcusable.

Rev. King once said that, “non-violence is the most potent weapon available to the Negro in his struggle for freedom and justice. I think for the Negro to turn to violence would be both impractical and immoral.” King also added, “I would hope that we can avoid riots because riots are self-defeating and socially destructive.”

Having forgotten King’s message of civility and non-violence, the nation is once again witness to the reasons why more and more people increasingly have such a low opinion of blacks in general, and why moral expectations of blacks are so low. With behavior like this, we’ve earned every bit of the condemnation and ridicule we get. Racist, out-of-control cops, emblematic of a racist country aren‘t to blame.

We are.

To say black priorities are out of order is a tremendous understatement. The overwhelming majority of these black suspects killed by police were attacking the cops or resisting arrest (Freddie Gray ran from police after he made eye contact with them), or had criminal histories. These men aren’t martyrs and black reverence for them reveals our broken moral compass. In addition to making saints of slain black suspects- and completely ignoring any and all facts relevant to every situation in which this occurs- blacks set out to destroy their own neighborhoods while calling for “justice.” No wonder the ghetto is the ghetto- an economic and social wasteland. This is why property values, which are already low, continue to decrease in value. It’s why people with any sense, don’t invest in black neighborhoods- too much risk, too little reward. It’s why those who can, leave the ghetto the moment the opportunity arises.

More so, our skewed moral compass is even more recognizable for this very reason. Regardless of how many black suspects who’re killed by police, it still pales in comparison to the numbers of blacks killed by other blacks through abortion and black-on-black criminality every year. Shockingly, blacks can’t find the time to riot over that. Blacks aren’t burning businesses over it either. Blacks aren’t holding vigils and demonstrations over the injustice of black genocide. This reality goes completely ignored when compared to what happens when a black suspect with a rap sheet is shot and killed by police. Like I said before, when you’re a victim, it’s always someone else’s fault. When you’re a victim- or in the case of blacks, the victim- the notion of personal responsibility doesn’t exist. And as long as blacks embrace this destructive identity, black chaos will continue.

People, regardless of color, need to stop making excuses for black violence, criminality and chaos. Blacks need to take responsibility for themselves- and this starts by blacks publicly and consistently denouncing such poor, socially destructive and irresponsible behavior. The shame and embarrassment that accompanies victimization, which has permeated and debilitated black culture, must come to an end. It’s time for blacks to consistently demonstrate that we’re not second-class citizens who’re incapable of living up to the standards we expect of everyone else.

The only things at stake are black self-respect, dignity and our reputations. I mean, black lives matter, right?

“Missing” Black Men Aren’t Lost- We Know Where They Are

missing-black-men-1429541892662-videoSixteenByNine1050

A recent article in the New York Times attempted to bring attention to- and speculate as to why- the so-called disappearance of young black men.  Here are a few excerpts from the piece-

“[Black men] are missing, largely because of early deaths or because they are behind bars. Remarkably, black women who are 25 to 54 and not in jail outnumber black men in that category by 1.5 million, according to an Upshot analysis. For every 100 black women in this age group living outside of jail, there are only 83 black men. Among whites, the equivalent number is 99, nearly parity.

African-American men have long been more likely to be locked up and more likely to die young, but the scale of the combined toll is nonetheless jarring. It is a measure of the deep disparities that continue to afflict black men — disparities being debated after a recent spate of killings by the police — and the gender gap is itself a further cause of social ills, leaving many communities without enough men to be fathers and husbands.

Perhaps the starkest description of the situation is this: More than one out of every six black men who today should be between 25 and 54 years old have disappeared from daily life.

…Incarceration and early deaths are the overwhelming drivers of the gap. Of the 1.5 million missing black men from 25 to 54 — which demographers call the prime-age years — higher imprisonment rates account for almost 600,000. Almost 1 in 12 black men in this age group are behind bars, compared with 1 in 60 nonblack men in the age group, 1 in 200 black women and 1 in 500 nonblack women.

Higher mortality is the other main cause. About 900,000 fewer prime-age black men than women live in the United States, according to the census. It’s impossible to know precisely how much of the difference is the result of mortality, but it appears to account for a big part. Homicide, the leading cause of death for young African-American men, plays a large role, and they also die from heart disease, respiratory disease and accidents more often than other demographic groups, including black women.

…The disappearance of these men has far-reaching implications. Their absence disrupts family formation, leading both to lower marriage rates and higher rates of childbirth outside marriage, as research by Kerwin Charles, an economist at the University of Chicago, with Ming-Ching Luoh, has shown.

The black women left behind find that potential partners of the same race are scarce, while men, who face an abundant supply of potential mates, don’t need to compete as hard to find one. As a result, Mr. Charles said, “men seem less likely to commit to romantic relationships, or to work hard to maintain them.”

african-americans-1-1000x600

Black men aren’t “missing” nor is it a “phenomenon.” Forget- actually, ignore- what the authors said about police shootings- police aren’t shooting enough black criminals to statistically contribute to the disparities between black men and women, or the numbers of ‘missing’ black men. What is ‘jarring’ is the fact that the self-destructive and destabilizing behaviors- which have been destigmatized due to low expectations and the stupidity that saturates bad ideas like racial and social “justice”- directly contribute to the criminality that leads to imprisonment and early death- particularly as it relates to black-on-black homicide. PERIOD.

And because of that- aided and abetted by the lack of moral self-policing of blacks by other blacks, everything else is destroyed in the process. Family formation and maintenance that provides the proper environment to raise and teach children- an environment where young black men are taught not to be the stereotypes (drugs, crime, hyper-sexuality and their glorification) that continue to undermine black credibility; where young black women are taught to regain and or retain the respectability of not having scores of illegitimi and how to choose a proper husband. It also leads to an expanded welfare state and intergenerational poverty that socially and economically reinforces these problems.

If we- and by we, I principally mean blacks as regardless what is thought and our actions sometimes reinforce, we’re autonomous beings with free will- want to normalize these numbers and “find” black men- we have to stop glorifying the values of death and destruction and embrace values that prioritize and glorify life and prosperity. Again, if black lives don’t matter to blacks, they sure as hell aren’t going to matter to non-blacks.

Lastly- black women who limit their options to just black men as boyfriends, spouses and eventual fathers are instrumental in their ongoing loneliness and have no one to blame but themselves. There’s an abundant pool of available men to choose as a spouse and a father when the racial limitations are lifted. I say this with all sincerity- black women, love isn’t confined to color, even if you are…

Sorry- You Can’t Demand A Wage You’re Not Worth

aa2

I’m sure you’ve seen fast food workers and their sympathizers “demonstrating” as they demand to be paid a wage higher than their skill set currently allows. Rather than be content with their current wage earnings, protestors are attempting to force their employers to pay them $15 per hour, based on nothing else than that’s the wage they want. These people need to be reminded that a minimum wage is for minimum skills. There’s no such thing as a “living wage,” as if people should get paid simply because they’re alive and kicking.

But why let the facts of life ruin a good, social-justice narrative that goes against the grain of sound economics?

From The Daily Mail

“A Chicago single mother has revealed what it’s really like to live on McDonald’s wages, where she makes only $10.50 an hour and can only afford to sleep in a moldy basement.

Adriana Alvarez, 22, says that even with assistance from food stamps, Medicaid, and a child care subsidy, she is barely getting by, despite having worked for McDonald’s for five years.

Alvarez is a leader with Fight For $15, an international movement to raise minimum wage laws and acquire the right to unionize.

…The mother revealed in a column for Refinery29 that the first thing she would do with an increased wage would be to find a ‘decent place to live’ with good schools for her three-year-old son Manny.

‘When it rains, water steeps into the apartment,’ Alvarez writes of her basement home, the only place she said she can afford.

…Alvarez said that, after paying for ‘child care, transportation to work, food, rent, and our other basic expenses,’ she can never afford to give anything else to her son.

According to the New York Times, Adriana Alvarez is also on food stamps, receives Medicaid, and a day care subsidy for her son.”

This is a sad story- and it’s supposed to be. If an economic argument can’t be made to increase the minimum wage for the minimally skilled, the next step is to make an emotional argument. After all, any employer who says ‘no’ to raising the wages of a needy employee like Adriana is cold-hearted and cruel-and that’s the message many of these “protestors” and members of ‘Fight for 15′ they’re trying to send.

But it still doesn’t jive.

First, Adriana is a single mother. Being so, why should her employer be guilted into increasing her hourly pay, simply to subsidize her bad decision making of having a child when she couldn’t afford to be a mother? It should be clear to anyone with an IQ above room temperature that the minimum wage isn’t supposed to be enough to support a family. A minimum wage job is supposed to be temporary until the worker earns enough on-the-job training to get a promotion or a raise, which then leads to other promotions and raises which then allows for a person to start and support a family.

Further still- where is her extended family? Are they not helping her? Why not?

Second, even if Adriana got her wage increase, chances are she’d still receive government benefits because she and others will eventually claim that “$15 an hour is still not enough,” which then presents the question- why’re these “protestors” stopping their demands at $15 an hour? Why not demand $20? Why not $25?

Third, if we increase the wages of the minimally skilled apart from actually being worth the increase, employers will then have to increase the pay of other positions as well.  When the minimum wage goes up, those employees who have more responsibilities and more job skills such as shift managers, weekend managers and store managers will also need an increase in pay to maintain the justification for employing them too.

Fourth, forget Adriana and others like her. Is it okay to pay a comfortable middle class, suburban teenager who lives with his parents $15 an hour as well? Or is it just for the noble and downtrodden people like Adriana?

The obvious problem in demanding a wage that’s not commensurate with one’s job skills or work history is that in many cases, if these folks were worth $15 an hour, they’d be making $15 per hour. But they’re not, so they shouldn’t.